Residential Cost Segregation Study
Prepared for Federal Income Tax Depreciation Purposes
Fictional sample report. Summary amounts are illustrative, not calculated study results. Proprietary formulas and detailed component values are omitted.
Executive Dashboard
This dashboard summarizes the property analyzed, the reclassification results, and the estimated tax impact.
| Asset Class | RecoveryPeriod | Method | Convention | Bonus % | AllocatedBasis | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Year Personal Property | 5 | 200 DB | HY | 100% | $75,000 | 15.0% |
| 15-Year Land Improvements | 15 | 150 DB | HY | 100% | $50,000 | 10.0% |
| 27.5-Year Residential Real Property | 27.5 | SL | MM | 0% | $375,000 | 75.0% |
| Total | $500,000 | 100.0% |
Illustrative amounts for this fictional example; not a prediction of savings.
Classification Breakdown
Half-donut view of how the analyzed basis is split across 5-year, 15-year, and 27.5-year classifications.
Depreciation Over Time
Year-by-year comparison showing the first-year acceleration created by the shorter-life reclassifications.
Illustrative values for the fictional example; not calculated study results.
Important assumption
Fictional sample report. Summary amounts are illustrative, not calculated study results. Proprietary formulas and detailed component values are omitted.
The tax benefit numbers shown here are illustrative federal estimates and still depend on filing posture, elections, passive activity rules, and preparer review. State tax treatment is outside this report unless separately modeled.
Understanding Your Study
This section explains the study in plain language. It is intended for the property owner and does not require any tax background to read.
Long-Term Rental Real Property is normally depreciated over 27.5 years under the applicable report classification.
Not every part of a property is treated as structural building. Some components may qualify for shorter lives because they function more like personal property or land improvements.
This study identifies, values, and documents those components so the depreciation schedule can be updated and supported.
In this fictional example, $75,000 is presented as 5-year personal property, $50,000 as 15-year land improvements, and $375,000 as residential real property. Together, these categories account for the $500,000 basis shown in the Executive Dashboard.
The summary illustrates how a completed report presents its conclusions. The detailed component calculations are omitted from this public sample.
Before Vs. After
A plain-English view of how the study changes the depreciation buckets.
The study does not change the total basis. It changes how that basis is grouped for depreciation.
Year 1 Impact Build-Up
Shows why the first-year deduction can increase after shorter-life property is identified.
Illustrative values for the fictional example; not calculated study results.
What Happens Next
The normal review path from study completion to CPA implementation.
Review the summary and confirm property facts look right.
Your preparer checks filing posture, bonus rules, and state treatment.
Current-year posting or method-change treatment is selected.
Keep the report and support schedules with tax records.
- Should this study be implemented on the current return or through a change in accounting method (Form 3115)?
- Does bonus depreciation apply to my filing year?
- Do passive activity rules limit my ability to use these deductions?
- Does my state tax return require separate preparer adjustments outside this federal report?
- Is a Section 481(a) adjustment needed?
- Are there any prior-year filing implications?
Property Profile & Scope
This section summarizes the subject property, the scope of the analysis, and the property-specific facts that influenced classification decisions.
The analysis relied on owner-provided tax basis, property facts, property intake responses, IRS depreciation authorities, Marshall Valuation Service (MVS), and RSMeans source support, except where this report states otherwise.
Site-visit scope: no independent physical site visit or field inspection was performed. Owner-provided information was reviewed as part of the analysis but is not reproduced in this report.
Cost-source reliance: MVS and RSMeans are used as cost-source references for modeled component costs and allocation support. They are not a physical site inspection, appraisal, engineering inspection, or independent verification of property condition.
Return-posture context: the reported filing tax year is 2025. Depreciation schedules in this report remain anchored to the placed-in-service year, while filing-year implications are addressed separately for preparer review.
Owner-provided reliance: Basis relies on the owner-provided tax basis, property facts, property intake responses, and other information expressly identified in this report unless this report states otherwise.
Site-visit limitation: No independent physical site visit or field inspection was performed. The analysis is limited to the report data, owner-provided facts, property intake responses, and cost-source framework described in this report.
Preparer qualifications: Basis Cost Segregation may use qualified reviewers, preparers, and technical personnel; principal cost segregation expert and technical methodology lead qualifications are summarized in Appendix A.
Audit support included: written IDR response support and methodology calls with the taxpayer's CPA or authorized tax representative are included at no additional charge for report-specific support, available through the relevant statute of limitations for the return using this report, generally three years from filing unless a different limitations period applies, and limited to 8 hours per issued report.
Audit support excluded and overage: representation, testimony, return preparation, legal advice, IRS power-of-attorney work, new analyses, site visits, and separately scoped documentation review are excluded. Support beyond 8 hours is billed at $350 per hour unless a separate written agreement says otherwise.
This fictional property is a two-story residential rental with mixed interior finishes and exterior site improvements.
A completed study documents the property facts that support each classification. This preview shows the report structure; its summary values are illustrative and are not derived from these example property facts.
CPA Implementation Guide
This section provides the information the tax preparer needs to apply the study on the return, including asset coding, depreciation schedules, and filing considerations.
| Asset ClassCode | Description | RecoveryPeriod | Method | Convention | Bonus % | AllocatedBasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.0 | 5-Year Personal Property | 5 | 200 DB | HY | 100% | $75,000 |
| 00.3 | 15-Year Land Improvements | 15 | 150 DB | HY | 100% | $50,000 |
| BLDG | 27.5-Year Residential Real Property | 27.5 | SL | MM | 0% | $375,000 |
| Total | $500,000 |
| Asset Class | AllocatedBasis | BonusDepreciation | RegularDepreciation | Total Year 1Depreciation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal property | $75,000 | $75,000 | $0 | $75,000 |
| Land improvements | $50,000 | $50,000 | $0 | $50,000 |
| Residential real property | $375,000 | $0 | $7,500 | $7,500 |
| Total | $500,000 | $125,000 | $7,500 | $132,500 |
Illustrative class-level amounts, shown to demonstrate how the report organizes the results.
| Tax year | Pre-study depreciation | Residential real property | Land improvements | Personal property | Post-study total | Change in depreciation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $10,000 | $7,500 | $50,000 | $75,000 | $132,500 | $122,500 |
| Later years (combined) | $490,000 | $367,500 | $0 | $0 | $367,500 | −$122,500 |
| Total | $500,000 | $375,000 | $50,000 | $75,000 | $500,000 | $0 |
Condensed illustrative schedule. The issued report provides annual schedules for CPA review; these sample values are not a calculated filing schedule.
| Tax year | Pre-study depreciation | Residential real property | Land improvements | Personal property | Post-study total | Change in depreciation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $10,000 | $7,500 | $50,000 | $75,000 | $132,500 | $122,500 |
| Later years (combined) | $490,000 | $367,500 | $0 | $0 | $367,500 | −$122,500 |
| Total | $500,000 | $375,000 | $50,000 | $75,000 | $500,000 | $0 |
Condensed illustrative schedule. The issued report provides annual schedules for CPA review; these sample values are not a calculated filing schedule.
| Topic | Applies? | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Current-year filing path | CPA review | Your preparer confirms whether this filing treatment applies to your property and return. |
| Look-back / method-change path | CPA review | Your preparer confirms whether this filing treatment applies to your property and return. |
| Form 3115 method-change filing | CPA review | Your preparer confirms whether this filing treatment applies to your property and return. |
| Section 481(a) catch-up estimate | CPA review | Your preparer confirms whether this filing treatment applies to your property and return. |
| State tax treatment | Not analyzed | This report is limited to federal income tax depreciation unless a separate state treatment workflow is added. |
| Bonus depreciation review | CPA review | Your preparer confirms whether this filing treatment applies to your property and return. |
This report is for federal income tax depreciation application only. Applies? indicates what this report suggests based on the property intake and report model. The entered filing tax year is 2025; schedules above still begin with the placed-in-service year. Yes means the topic appears to apply. No means it is not currently modeled as applying. Review means the preparer should confirm the treatment before filing.
| Placed-in-Service Window | Shorter-Life Bonus % | Primary Source |
|---|---|---|
| Before 09/28/2017 | 50% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
| 09/28/2017 through 12/31/2022 | 100% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
| 01/01/2023 through 12/31/2023 | 80% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
| 01/01/2024 through 12/31/2024 | 60% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
| 01/01/2025 through 01/19/2025 | 40% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
| After 01/19/2025 | 100% | Primary source reference withheld from this sample |
Illustrative bonus-treatment reference. Primary-source citations are withheld from this public sample; your preparer confirms the applicable treatment.
- Bonus treatment modeledThis report models 100% bonus on eligible 5-year and 15-year classes using the placed-in-service date.
- Preparer confirmationFinal return treatment should be confirmed by the preparer.
- Report supportThis report provides engineering-based basis allocations and class-life determinations using IRS depreciation authorities, MVS source material, and RSMeans cost support.
- Return implementationTax return implementation, elections, method changes, passive activity treatment, state-level filing adjustments, and filing positions remain the responsibility of the taxpayer and return preparer.
- Schedule statusThe schedules shown here are illustrative unless explicitly marked as return-ready in the final engagement workflow.
Methodology
This section summarizes how the study was performed, from initial data gathering through final reconciliation.
- Gather information
- Determine basis
- Develop cost model
- Identify shorter-life assets
- Allocate costs
- Reconcile to basis
- Produce schedules
Step 1 — Supporting Information. This space represents the detailed narrative included in the completed report. The sample preserves the length and arrangement of the document while withholding the underlying study-specific analysis.
Step 2 — Basis Documentation. The completed report provides a written discussion alongside the summary information. This paragraph is sample copy only, included to show the depth and reading experience of that supporting documentation.
Step 3 — Analysis Support. Additional narrative appears here in the issued report. Its proprietary details have been replaced for this preview, while the paragraph structure, spacing, and relationship to the rest of the methodology section are preserved.
Step 4 — Classification Support. The issued report contains a fuller discussion supporting the study conclusions and their review. This longer sample paragraph represents the amount of written explanation a reader can expect in this part of the document. It does not reproduce the underlying reasoning, formulas, source references, or component-level instructions. Those details belong to the completed engagement and are intentionally absent from the public preview.
Step 5 — Allocation Documentation. This paragraph represents the supporting discussion supplied with the completed study. It is neutral sample copy that preserves the document layout without disclosing the detailed calculation approach.
Step 6 — Reconciliation Support. The completed report includes written support for the summarized results. The public example retains room for that explanation, while the original technical content is replaced before the page is delivered.
Step 7 — Schedule Documentation. This final paragraph represents the narrative accompanying the report schedules and preparer materials. It is included to demonstrate the full methodology section without reproducing proprietary study content.
Important assumption
The completed report explains the assumptions supporting the analysis. Proprietary calculations and source-specific details are withheld in this public preview.
Reclassification Results And Line-Item Support
This section consolidates the asset-class results, item-level cost support, subtotals, and reconciliation to total basis analyzed.
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARPET | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VINYL PLANK | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| KITCHEN SINK - MULTIBOWL | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| KITCHEN SINK - ROUGH-IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| REFRIGERATOR ROUGH IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| PENDANT LIGHT | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| CHANDELIERS | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING MOUNTED PENDANT LIGHTS | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STANDARD LIGHTING ROUGH-IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - EQUIP DATA LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear concrete site improvement | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STRUCTURAL BACKFILL | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STRUCTURAL BUILDING SITE PREPARATION | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS- CLASS D MASONRY VENEER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| FRAMING EXCLUDING FRAMED BASEMENT | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| WOOD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| GYPSUM BOARD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| FRAME INTERIOR PARTITIONS (W/ INTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS) | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING PLUMBING SYSTEM | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING POWER & LIGHTING | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| ROOF STRUCTURE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asphalt/Membrane | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VANITY BASE CABINETS-NATURAL, LACQUER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VANITY COUNTERS- SOLID SURFACE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BATHROOM FULL HEIGHT CABINETS-NATURAL, LACQUER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - ELECTRICAL SERVICE LINE OVERHEAD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - ELECTRICAL SERVICE LINE UNDERGROUND | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - GAS LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - SANITARY SEWER LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - WATER LINES | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
Component names show the type of support included. Quantities, formulas, and detailed values are omitted from this sample.
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARPET | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VINYL PLANK | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| KITCHEN SINK - MULTIBOWL | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| KITCHEN SINK - ROUGH-IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| REFRIGERATOR ROUGH IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| PENDANT LIGHT | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| CHANDELIERS | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING MOUNTED PENDANT LIGHTS | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STANDARD LIGHTING ROUGH-IN | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - EQUIP DATA LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear concrete site improvement | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STRUCTURAL BACKFILL | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| STRUCTURAL BUILDING SITE PREPARATION | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
Component names show the type of support included. Quantities, formulas, and detailed values are omitted from this sample.
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS- CLASS D MASONRY VENEER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| FRAMING EXCLUDING FRAMED BASEMENT | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| WOOD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| GYPSUM BOARD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| FRAME INTERIOR PARTITIONS (W/ INTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS) | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING PLUMBING SYSTEM | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BUILDING POWER & LIGHTING | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| ROOF STRUCTURE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| Asphalt/Membrane | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VANITY BASE CABINETS-NATURAL, LACQUER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| VANITY COUNTERS- SOLID SURFACE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| BATHROOM FULL HEIGHT CABINETS-NATURAL, LACQUER | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - ELECTRICAL SERVICE LINE OVERHEAD | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - ELECTRICAL SERVICE LINE UNDERGROUND | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
Component names show the type of support included. Quantities, formulas, and detailed values are omitted from this sample.
| Asset / component | Quantity | Unit | Calculation detail | Replacement cost | Allocated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTILITIES - GAS LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - SANITARY SEWER LINE | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
| UTILITIES - WATER LINES | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld | Sample detail withheld |
Component names show the type of support included. Quantities, formulas, and detailed values are omitted from this sample.
| Asset Class | AllocatedBasis | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Year Personal Property | $75,000 | 15.0% |
| 15-Year Land Improvements | $50,000 | 10.0% |
| Residential Real Property | $375,000 | 75.0% |
| Total | $500,000 | 100.0% |
| Reconciliation Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total basis analyzed | $500,000 |
| Total allocated basis | $500,000 |
| Unreconciled difference | $0 |
All category totals and detailed line-item allocations have been reconciled to the total basis analyzed. Where estimated component costs required normalization, allocation factors and report scaling were applied within the MVS/RSMeans-backed cost model.
Legal Authority And Asset Classification Framework
This section summarizes the federal depreciation classification framework used for residential rental property cost segregation reports generated by Basis Cost Seg.
Scope: This report applies the residential rental property classification framework under IRC Section 168(e)(2)(A) and a 27.5-year recovery period under MACRS. Component-level reclassification relies on Section 1245 tangible personal property analysis. Qualified Improvement Property under IRC Section 168(e)(6) is not available for residential rental property and is not applied in this report.
Report preparation brings together the property information, supporting records, and schedules presented in this study. The discussion connects those materials to the report findings so the owner and tax preparer can follow the basis for review.
The classification framework provides a consistent way to organize the assets identified in the property. Each part of the report has a distinct purpose, from describing the property to presenting the schedules and qualifications that accompany the results.
Section 167(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 establishes the foundational authority for depreciation deductions, permitting a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence of property used in a trade or business or held for the production of income.
The authority discussion connects the report terminology to the references used throughout the study. It provides context for the classifications and schedules, with supporting notes organized alongside the relevant topic. Readers can use the section headings to locate a particular subject, then consult the accompanying report materials for the property information on which the discussion depends.
IRC Section 168(e)(2)(A) defines residential rental property as a building or structure from which 80 percent or more of the gross rental income for the taxable year is rental income from dwelling units. For this purpose, a dwelling unit means a house or apartment used to provide living accommodations in a building or structure, but does not include a unit in a hotel, motel, or other establishment in which more than one-half of the units are used on a transient basis.
The property profile records the rental use described for this study. That context is carried through the classification discussion and the report schedules so the reader can compare the findings with the property information supplied for review.
Rental-use information should be read together with the supporting property records. Questions about the description of the property or the information supplied for the study can be identified during the owner and preparer review.
The scope of this study is described in the property profile and accompanying qualifications. The discussion is tied to that stated scope. Information about a different property, use, or reporting period should be reviewed separately rather than assumed to be covered by the same report.
Property in the 3-year through 10-year recovery classes is depreciated using the 200 percent declining balance method, with a mandatory switch to straight-line in the first year that method yields a greater deduction. Property in the 15-year and 20-year classes uses the 150 percent declining balance method with the same crossover rule. Residential rental property (27.5-year) is recovered exclusively under the straight-line method using a mid-month convention.
The report schedules organize the results by asset class and show the associated recovery information in one place. The classification discussion provides context for reading those schedules. The owner and preparer can review the summary alongside the supporting detail and the limitations stated elsewhere in the report.
Rev. Proc. 87-56 organizes depreciable assets into two broad categories: Asset Classes 00.11 through 00.4, which cover specific assets used across all business activities regardless of industry (asset categories), and Asset Classes 01.1 through 80.0, which cover assets used in specific business activities (activity categories). When a single item of depreciable property is described under both an asset category and an activity category, the asset category governs unless the property is specifically excluded from that asset category or specifically included in the activity category. Three asset classes under Rev. Proc. 87-56 are directly applicable to this report.
Asset Class 00.12 designates Information Systems as 5-year property under the GDS, recovered using the 200 percent declining balance method switching to straight-line. This class covers computers, peripheral equipment, and integrated information systems hardware placed in service in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business. For properties placed in service after December 31, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act removed computers and peripheral equipment from the listed property rules of Section 280F, eliminating the business-use percentage documentation requirements that previously applied to this asset class.
The equipment discussion describes the items identified in the property records and the context in which they are used. Supporting descriptions help the reader distinguish individual equipment from the broader building systems discussed elsewhere in the report.
Equipment descriptions and the property locations recorded for review.
Smart thermostats functioning as part of a connected home system rather than as a primary building HVAC control
Installation information available in the supporting property records.
Owner-provided observations about the equipment and its use.
Tenant-interface tablets or devices provided for occupant use
Supporting documentation associated with the identified items.
Equipment notes carried forward for owner and preparer review.
The equipment discussion should be read with the related schedules and report qualifications. Any missing or uncertain property information can be raised during review so the supporting records and the report description can be considered together.
Asset Class 00.3 designates Land Improvements as 15-year property under the GDS, recovered using the 150 percent declining balance method switching to straight-line. This class encompasses improvements made directly to or added to land, whether characterized as Section 1245 or Section 1250 property, provided they are depreciable. Qualifying assets include sidewalks, roads, canals, waterways, drainage facilities, sewers (excluding municipal sewers under Class 51), wharves, docks, bridges, fences, landscaping, shrubbery, and radio and television transmitting towers. Excluded from this class are land improvements explicitly assigned to another asset class, buildings and structural components as defined under Treas. Reg. Section 1.48-1(e), and public utility initial clearing and grading improvements addressed in Rev. Rul. 72-403, 1972-2 C.B. 102.
The site-improvement discussion groups the exterior items described in the property records. Their locations, descriptions, and supporting documentation provide context for reviewing the corresponding report entries alongside the property profile.
Asset Class 57.0 designates assets used in Distributive Trades and Services as 5-year property under the GDS, recovered using the 200 percent declining balance method switching to straight-line. This class encompasses assets used in wholesale and retail trade and in personal and professional services. Under established IRS guidance and case law — including the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide — this asset class extends to tangible personal property within residential rental properties that serves the rental function rather than the structural integrity of the building.
The following entries illustrate how the report organizes component descriptions. Each description is read together with the available property records, supporting notes, and corresponding schedule entry.
Interior component descriptions documented in the property records.
Cabinetry, countertops, and shelving unrelated to the structural operation or maintenance of the building
Room locations associated with the identified component entries.
Supporting purchase and installation records supplied for review.
Kitchen and laundry appliances (refrigerators, ranges, dishwashers, washers, dryers)
Additional component notes recorded during preparation of the study.
Related documentation linked to the component descriptions.
Electrical service connections dedicated to items of tangible personal property (dedicated appliance outlets and circuits)
The component discussion connects the descriptions in this section with the supporting report schedules. The reader can compare those entries with the property information and records supplied for the study. Questions about an individual item should identify the relevant description and report section so the review can address the specific entry.
Section 168(k) provides for bonus depreciation, allowing an immediate first-year deduction on a specified percentage of the cost of eligible business property. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 established 100 percent bonus depreciation for qualified property acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023, and eliminated the original-use requirement, extending eligibility to used property so long as the taxpayer had not previously placed that property in service. The TCJA phased bonus depreciation down beginning in 2023: 80 percent in 2023, 60 percent in 2024, 40 percent in 2025, and 20 percent in 2026, with full expiration in 2027 absent further legislative action.
The timing discussion draws attention to the dates recorded for the study and the assumptions shown in the report. Supporting acquisition and completion records provide context for reviewing those dates. The owner and preparer should read the timing information together with the schedules and qualifications, and identify any discrepancy between the report and the underlying records before using the results.
The summary schedules present the treatment shown for each asset class. The accompanying discussion provides context for reviewing those figures without replacing the detailed schedules. The report assumptions and preparer notes remain part of that review, including any questions about the information supplied for the study.
The principal classification question is whether a particular asset is tangible personal property, a land improvement, or a building or structural component. Treasury Regulation Section 1.48-1 and the former investment tax credit authorities remain important classification references for MACRS cost segregation analysis.
Reference notes accompany the timing discussion to help the reader locate the supporting material. They should be considered alongside the report assumptions and qualifications.
Residential kitchen components are evaluated at the component level rather than by a blanket room-level rule. Identified kitchen cabinets, counters, sinks, and directly related dedicated service components may be classified as Section 1245 tangible personal property where the property facts support removability, separate identity, non-structural function, and direct association with specific tangible personal property.
The kitchen and bathroom discussion follows the component descriptions recorded for the property. Supporting notes distinguish the items being reviewed and connect them to the relevant report entries. The room name alone does not describe the full scope of the work or the information supplied for the study.
The available records may describe several kinds of work within the same room. Clear descriptions help the reader follow the relationship between those records and the report entries, particularly where a single invoice covers more than one item.
Dedicated branch plumbing or electrical service directly connected to specific depreciable kitchen appliances, kitchen sinks, or other separately identified tangible personal property may be classified with that property where the report data documents the dedicated function and cost. If the available data does not separately identify dedicated service, the report should not imply a separately modeled plumbing or electrical allocation.
Bathroom component descriptions are presented with the associated property information. Supporting records and report notes provide the context for reviewing each entry.
The component review brings together the recorded descriptions, available documentation, and report schedules. Questions about the scope of an entry can be raised with reference to those materials. The discussion should be read with the qualifications and assumptions that apply to the study as a whole.
The report framework relies on statutory depreciation concepts, Treasury Regulation Section 1.48-1, and judicial authorities applying the tangible-personal-property and structural-component tests. Detailed authorities may be referenced in the appendix or workpaper support when needed for reviewer analysis.
The report findings depend on the property information and supporting records available for the study. The scope and limitations sections describe that reliance so the owner and preparer can understand the context in which the report was prepared.
The report date identifies when this document was prepared. Later changes to the property or its supporting information may require further review. Readers should retain the report version and the records used when reviewing its findings.
The IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide and IRS Publication 5653 are treated as nonbinding guidance for documentation and examination posture rather than controlling legal authority.
Each authority reference has a specific role in the discussion. The accompanying notes explain its context within the report and should be read together with the property information and stated scope.
The reference materials, cost-support notes, and report schedules serve different purposes. Reading them together helps the preparer follow the supporting documentation and identify any questions that need to be resolved during review.
The final review brings together the property description, classification discussion, schedules, and qualifications. The owner and preparer can use the report outline to locate each part of that record. Any questions should identify the report version, section, and entry involved so the supporting information can be reviewed in context.
Assumptions, Limitations & Certification
This section states the assumptions and limitations under which the study was performed, documents the internal quality review, and provides the preparer certification.
- Data assumptionsBasis, placed-in-service facts, rental-use facts, and property characteristics were taken from owner-provided information and property intake responses unless otherwise noted.
- Methodology assumptionsWhere detailed actual cost records were unavailable, accepted estimation methods, MVS source material, and RSMeans cost support were used to support the cost model.
- Tax assumptionsThis report models 100% bonus on eligible shorter-life classes based on the placed-in-service date for federal income tax depreciation. State tax treatment is outside this report unless separately modeled.
- Reliance and useThis report is intended for the client and the client's tax advisors for federal income tax depreciation review. It is not a legal opinion, and tax return implementation remains the responsibility of the taxpayer and preparer.
- Ownership and filing limitationsBasis Cost Seg does not independently verify legal title, ownership percentages, entity classification, at-risk limitations, passive activity limitations, or whether the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to claim the deductions shown.
- Return-preparation limitationsRecovery-period, convention, method-change, Section 481(a), and bonus depreciation assumptions remain subject to the final CPA filing posture, elections, and return preparation procedures.
- Scope exclusionsThis report does not provide testimony, litigation support, securities offering support, SEC reporting support, financial-statement services, or non-tax valuation services unless separately engaged in writing.
- Section 263A and capitalization limitationsUniform capitalization under IRC Section 263A, repair-versus-capitalization treatment, and other capitalization issues are not analyzed unless separately modeled.
- Visual and source limitationsAny generated component visuals, cost-source exhibits, or other visual aids are illustrative support only. They are not independent field verification, legal surveys, appraisals, engineering inspections, or substitutes for taxpayer records and preparer review.
- Law-change and update limitationFederal tax law, IRS guidance, and cost sources can change. Basis Cost Seg may update future report templates periodically, including yearly updates where appropriate, but this issued report is based on the sources and data available as of the report date unless separately updated.
- Quality assuranceAn issued study is reviewed for consistency, reconciliation, and supporting documentation. This fictional sample has not been reviewed as a completed engagement.
- CertificationThe issued report includes the preparer certification. No certification is made for this fictional sample.
- Prepared ByBasis Cost Seg | Fictional sample report
Glossary
Common depreciation and allocation terms used throughout the report.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ADS | Alternative Depreciation System. A slower depreciation method used in certain tax situations or by election. |
| Allocation Factor | A scaling factor used to bring estimated component costs back to the total basis analyzed when direct costs do not already sum exactly to basis. |
| Appendix | A reference section placed after the main report for expanded support schedules, source notes, or reviewer detail. |
| Asset Class | A tax grouping that determines recovery period, depreciation method, and convention. |
| Basis Analyzed | The dollar amount of property basis included in the study and allocated across tax lives. |
| Bonus Depreciation | An additional first-year depreciation allowance that may apply to eligible shorter-life property depending on filing year and tax law. |
| GDS | General Depreciation System. The standard MACRS framework used for most federal income tax depreciation. |
| Half-Year Convention | A convention that generally treats eligible property as placed in service halfway through the tax year. |
| Land Improvements | Exterior site features such as paving, fencing, and landscaping that may receive a 15-year recovery period when separately identified. |
| MACRS | Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System, the federal tax depreciation system that sets lives, methods, and conventions. |
| Mid-Month Convention | A convention generally used for residential rental property that treats the asset as placed in service in the middle of the month. |
| MVS | Marshall Valuation Service source material used as cost-source and classification support in the report model. |
| Recovery Period | The number of tax years over which an asset is depreciated. |
| Section 1245 Property | Generally personal property or certain non-structural property that can qualify for shorter recovery periods. |
| Section 1250 Property | Generally building and structural real property, including residential rental property depreciated over longer lives. |
| Section 481(a) Adjustment | The cumulative catch-up adjustment that may arise when a method change is implemented through Form 3115. |
| Straight Line | A depreciation method that spreads basis evenly over the recovery period. |
| 150 DB | 150 percent declining-balance depreciation method, often used for 15-year land improvements. |
| 200 DB | 200 percent declining-balance depreciation method, often used for 5-year personal property. |
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ADS | Alternative Depreciation System. A slower depreciation method used in certain tax situations or by election. |
| Allocation Factor | A scaling factor used to bring estimated component costs back to the total basis analyzed when direct costs do not already sum exactly to basis. |
| Appendix | A reference section placed after the main report for expanded support schedules, source notes, or reviewer detail. |
| Asset Class | A tax grouping that determines recovery period, depreciation method, and convention. |
| Basis Analyzed | The dollar amount of property basis included in the study and allocated across tax lives. |
| Bonus Depreciation | An additional first-year depreciation allowance that may apply to eligible shorter-life property depending on filing year and tax law. |
| GDS | General Depreciation System. The standard MACRS framework used for most federal income tax depreciation. |
| Half-Year Convention | A convention that generally treats eligible property as placed in service halfway through the tax year. |
| Land Improvements | Exterior site features such as paving, fencing, and landscaping that may receive a 15-year recovery period when separately identified. |
| MACRS | Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System, the federal tax depreciation system that sets lives, methods, and conventions. |
| Mid-Month Convention | A convention generally used for residential rental property that treats the asset as placed in service in the middle of the month. |
| MVS | Marshall Valuation Service source material used as cost-source and classification support in the report model. |
| Recovery Period | The number of tax years over which an asset is depreciated. |
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Section 1245 Property | Generally personal property or certain non-structural property that can qualify for shorter recovery periods. |
| Section 1250 Property | Generally building and structural real property, including residential rental property depreciated over longer lives. |
| Section 481(a) Adjustment | The cumulative catch-up adjustment that may arise when a method change is implemented through Form 3115. |
| Straight Line | A depreciation method that spreads basis evenly over the recovery period. |
| 150 DB | 150 percent declining-balance depreciation method, often used for 15-year land improvements. |
| 200 DB | 200 percent declining-balance depreciation method, often used for 5-year personal property. |
Principal Cost Segregation Expert Qualifications
Resume-style qualifications appendix for Basis Cost Segregation technical leadership.
Roel A. Vicerra, MBA
Cost segregation professional with 15 years of specialized experience, including over 10 years at KPMG, 3 years as Senior Manager at ICS Tax, LLC, and independent cost segregation consulting for small multifamily properties. Combines Big 4 tax discipline, a formal architecture education, and active real estate investment experience to deliver IRS audit-defensible, component-level depreciation studies. Expert in IRC Sec. 168/1245/1250, bonus depreciation, Tangible Property Regulations, and Construction Cost Analysis.
- Cost Segregation Studies
- IRC Sec. 168 / Bonus Depreciation
- IRS Audit Defense & Support
- Tangible Property Regulations
- Construction Cost Analysis (CCA)
- Fixed Asset Review & Integration
- Engagement Portfolio Management
- Multifamily & Commercial Real Estate
- Financial Modeling & Underwriting
Managing Partner
Basis Cost Segregation, LLC - Houston, TX
- Co-founded firm combining 15 years of cost segregation practice leadership with a technology-enabled service model; serves as primary technical authority for all methodologies, IRC compliance standards, and quality benchmarks governing every study issued.
- Architected the firm's engagement workflow, from feasibility assessment and data collection through field documentation, Construction Cost Analysis, and final delivery, maintaining the engineering rigor and IRS defensibility of Big 4-caliber work.
- Maintains direct technical oversight of all IRC Sec. 168/1245/1250 reclassification analyses, bonus depreciation modeling, Tangible Property Regulation compliance, and Construction Cost Analysis workpapers to ensure IRS audit-ready standards on every engagement.
Cost Segregation Senior Manager
ICS Tax, LLC - Houston, TX
- Co-directed the cost segregation department's day-to-day operations, establishing quality standards, workflow protocols, and technical review procedures to ensure consistent, IRS-defensible deliverables across all engagements.
- Oversaw and reviewed studies across commercial, multifamily, industrial, retail, hospitality, and healthcare asset classes, applying IRC Sec. 168/1245/1250 reclassification, MACRS/ADS modeling, and Tangible Property Regulation compliance in accordance with ASCSP standards.
- Participated in IRS examination defense on select cost segregation engagements, providing technical documentation and asset classification support to substantiate study positions under audit.
Federal Tax Manager, Cost Segregation
KPMG LLP - Houston, TX
- Managed 40+ accelerated cost recovery studies concurrently ($500K-$1B total project cost) for Fortune 500 clients and owner-operators within KPMG's national cost segregation practice.
- Applied IRC Sec. 168/1245/1250 to perform component-level reclassification of real property, executing detailed Construction Cost Analyses through quantity takeoffs, trade cost allocation, and contractor bid reconciliation.
- Conducted on-site building inspections, photographic documentation, and engineering assessments to identify and classify qualifying assets, including electrical systems, plumbing, HVAC, specialty lighting, and site improvements.
Independent Cost Segregation Consultant
Small Multifamily Properties
- Performed independent cost segregation studies for small multifamily investor clients, concurrent with real estate sales advisory work below.
- Advised individual real estate investors on asset classification and accelerated depreciation strategy outside a traditional firm engagement pipeline.
Owner
Crusader Equity Management LLC - Houston, TX
- Active real estate investor and owner-operator continuously since 2013, held concurrently with all cost segregation positions listed above; portfolio spans a 59-unit multifamily syndication and multiple single-family and small multifamily investment properties, providing direct operator experience across the full investment lifecycle.
- Executed property acquisitions, managed capital improvement programs, and applied cost segregation studies directly to owned portfolio, reinforcing firsthand understanding of after-tax return impact.
- Delivered quarterly financial reports and prepared financial statements for limited partners, building credibility as both a practicing real estate operator and tax strategy advisor.
Multifamily Property Sales Advisor
LS Realty Advisors - Houston, TX
- Buyer representative with $30M+ in closed multifamily asset transactions across south and central Texas markets, advising investors on acquisition strategy, valuation, and long-term hold analysis.
- Performed investment underwriting including proforma financial modeling, rent roll analysis, and cap rate benchmarking; conducted site inspections and construction cost estimating that directly informed cost segregation feasibility analysis.
Director of Asset Management
Makaan Investment Group - Houston, TX
- Held asset management oversight for approximately 5,000 multifamily units across Texas, including direct execution of the capital expenditure program for a core portfolio of 2,500 units across eleven properties.
- Managed full capital improvement lifecycle, including budgeting, contractor coordination, unit upgrade scheduling, and lender draw submissions, maintaining on-budget execution across concurrent rehab projects.
- Performed financial underwriting and due diligence on potential acquisitions, including site inspections, code compliance verification, and value-add improvement feasibility analysis.
Project Architect / Project Designer
Gensler Architects & BHDP, Inc.
- Led commercial and industrial project production across full construction lifecycle, schematic design through construction administration, establishing the construction specification and building systems foundation applied throughout cost segregation career.
- Member, American Society of Cost Segregation Professionals (ASCSP)
- LEED Accredited Professional (LEED AP)
- Texas Real Estate Salesperson License #633879
- Master of Business Administration (MBA) - Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX
- Bachelor of Architecture, Honors Studio - University of Houston, Houston, TX
Cost Source Notes
Source framework notes written for report readers.
- Cost-source referencesDetailed source references and cost-support notes are omitted from this public sample.
- Component-level supportSource-specific pricing and calculation support are included in the issued report, not this preview.